BackgroundI present an illustrative conceptual model of how economic and legal disincentives may drive specialty and practice-setting misallocation in South Korean essential medicine, alongside--not instead of--aggregate workforce constraints, examined through the "Vital 5" specialties (Internal Medicine, General Surgery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Cardiothoracic Surgery).
MethodsI built two models: a Human-Capital Misallocation Cost model estimating resources lost when specialists work outside their training, and an Expected Value (E(V)) model of entry into essential fields incorporating Net Return (Rnet), Probability of Lawsuit during a practicing physicians lifetime (Psuit), and Cost of Risk (Crisk). All parameters are stated assumptions with sensitivity analyses. A national replacement-cost equivalent was derived from emergency-system expenditure per resident vacancy in the 2024 crisis and a mismatch rate taken directly from national data.
Yu, H. et al. · CC-BY 4.0